Welcome to Daily Rundown
This is our premium blog on the law of non-competes and restrictive covenants, available to subscribers only.
Each day we provide national coverage on the latest state and federal judicial decisions, legislation, regulatory activity, and more.
Browse Categories
- Motion to Dismiss 249
- Preliminary Injunction 241
- Legislative Update 229
- Appeal 207
- Reasonableness of Covenants 203
- TRO 171
- Summary Judgment 165
- Tortious Interference 159
- Choice of Law Provision 135
- FTC Update 101
- Blue Pencil/Reformation 96
- Forum-Selection Provision 91
- Damages 80
- Franchise 71
- Conduct Constituting Breach 69
- Personal Jurisdiction 69
- Declaratory Judgment 65
- Federal Jurisdiction 63
- Attorneys' Fees 60
- Arbitration 59
- Financial Services Industry 49
- Transfer 44
- Consideration 42
- Insurance Brokerage Industry 40
- Permanent Injunction 37
- Statutory Interpretation 34
- Discovery 33
- Employee Raiding 33
- Expedited Discovery 32
- Standing 32
- NLRB 31
- Liquidated Damages 30
- Business Interest 29
- Existence of Contract 29
- Motion to Stay 29
- Integration Clause 23
- Bond 22
- Mootness 21
- Medical Device Sales Industry 20
- Sanctions 20
- Signature 18
- Clawback Agreement 17
- Consent Order 17
- Independent Contractor 17
- Post-Trial Motions 17
- Assignment 16
- Trial 16
- Federal Antitrust Law 15
- Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 15
- Class Action 14
Browse Tags
- Preliminary injunction denied 139
- No irreparable harm 107
- Preliminary injunction granted 102
- TRO denied 96
- Texas law applied 96
- New York law applied 92
- Choice of law provision enforced 89
- Florida law applied 75
- TRO granted 75
- California law applied 73
- Ohio law applied 68
- Delaware law applied 66
- Overbroad geographic scope 64
- Forum-selection provision enforced 63
- Overbroad behavioral restriction 51
- Illinois law applied 49
- Pennsylvania law applied 49
- North Carolina law applied 45
- New Jersey law applied 44
- Interlocutory appeal 40
- Michigan law applied 39
- Choice of law provision not enforced 37
- Arizona law applied 35
- Georgia law applied 33
- Minnesota law applied 33
- Washington law applied 33
- Virginia law applied 32
- Missouri law applied 31
- Physicians 31
- No legitimate business interest 30
- Tennessee law applied 30
- Blue pencil request denied 28
- Indiana law applied 27
- Maryland law applied 27
- Motion to remand granted 27
- Sufficient consideration 27
- Arbitration clause enforced 26
- Massachusetts law applied 25
- Reformation request denied 24
- Louisiana law applied 23
- Overbroad scope of protected customers 23
- Nebraska law applied 21
- Amount in controversy 20
- First breach defense 20
- Insufficient minimum contacts 20
- Janitor rule 20
- Overbroad temporal scope 20
- Forum-selection provision not enforced 19
- Reformation request allowed 19
- Sufficient minimum contacts 19